| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is lamia with the (monster) ? [[User:Loki|Loki]] | Why is lamia with the (monster) ? [[User:Loki|Loki]] | ||
:Thats how it was imported as a link, I'm guessing; there are about 20 different uses of the word on wikipedia. [[User:Devious Viper|Viper]] | |||
::I'd leave it like that, also "incubus" for its many different uses has the (monster). Of course we won't be posting non monstrous material, but it helps guests flicking through our articles --[[User:Bloody Angel|Bloody Angel]] 02:15, 29 August 2006 (EDT) | |||
:::I disagree; keeping the "(monster)" tag implies we have more than one article. Also, we don't do that for many other monsters that have more than one use. So I've redirected it. [[User:Devious Viper|Viper]] 05:40, 29 August 2006 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 29 August 2006
Why is lamia with the (monster) ? Loki
- Thats how it was imported as a link, I'm guessing; there are about 20 different uses of the word on wikipedia. Viper
- I'd leave it like that, also "incubus" for its many different uses has the (monster). Of course we won't be posting non monstrous material, but it helps guests flicking through our articles --Bloody Angel 02:15, 29 August 2006 (EDT)
- I disagree; keeping the "(monster)" tag implies we have more than one article. Also, we don't do that for many other monsters that have more than one use. So I've redirected it. Viper 05:40, 29 August 2006 (EDT)
- I'd leave it like that, also "incubus" for its many different uses has the (monster). Of course we won't be posting non monstrous material, but it helps guests flicking through our articles --Bloody Angel 02:15, 29 August 2006 (EDT)